|
|
Classmate Scoring Guide for The
Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy Projects (40% of total project
score)
Evaluator: _______________________________________
Presenter(s):
________________________________________________________________
Please circle the score that best applies to
the quality of the project and presentation in each of the following areas.
Also, provide at least one comment at the end.
1.
How creative was the project? |
3 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
The project
was lacking in creativity. There was almost nothing in the project that
showed ingenuity or application beyond the norm. |
The project
showed some creativity, but the ingenuity was barely above the norm. |
Both the
project showed adequate ingenuity; it was above creative average. |
The project
showed a good amount of creativity. |
The project
was extremely creative. Ideas incorporated far exceeded the norm. |
|
2.
How well did the presentation exhibit/explain the choices made in the
project (a.k.a. ANALYSIS of the project)? |
3 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
There was no
real analysis provided. |
Presentation
touched on some of the choices and reasons for them. |
Presentation
provided adequate information about what particular choices the creator(s)
made in the project & why. |
Presentation
provided a good amount info about what particular choices the creator(s)
made in the project & why. |
Presentation
included significant info about what particular choices the creator(s) made
in the project and why. |
|
3.
How well did the project and presentation reflect the
nature/content of the book? (As part of this, consider the
“significance” of what was reflected—Did the student just stick to
portraying/using basic, literal connections OR did the student display a
deeper understanding of the work, how it was created, and why?) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
It did not
reflect the book. |
It attempted
to reflect the book. |
It did reflect
the book, but the connections were weak/ focused on insignificant matters. |
It reflected
the book, the connections were true to the book and reasonably significant.
|
It reflected
the book. The connections were true and totally significant to the book. |
|
4.
How thorough and clear was the presentation? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
It was hard to
follow the presentation either because the content was confusing or the
speaker did not articulate well. |
It was a
little difficult to follow the presentation. The presentation could have
been more thorough. |
The
presentation was clear but could have been a little more thorough |
The
presentation was clear and thorough |
The
presentation was completely clear and thoroughly covered all aspects of the
project. |
|
5. Please
write at least one thoughtful comment in response to this project and
presentation. |
|
|
TOTAL: / 40 |
|
|
|
Teacher Scoring Guide for The
Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy Projects (60% of total project score)
Evaluator: MS. SPACHMAN
Presenter(s):
________________________________________________________________
1.
How creative was the project? |
3 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
The project
was lacking in creativity. There was almost nothing in the project that
showed ingenuity or application beyond the norm. |
The project
showed some creativity, but the ingenuity was barely above the norm. |
Both the
project showed adequate ingenuity; it was above creative average. |
The project
showed a good amount of creativity. |
The project
was extremely creative. Ideas incorporated far exceeded the norm. |
|
2.
How well did the WRITTEN ANALYSIS explain the choices made in the
project? |
0 |
8 |
12 |
16 |
20 |
No written
analysis provided. |
Written
analysis provided some minor information about choices and why they were
made (effects). |
Written
analysis explained several of the choices and why they were made. |
Written
analysis explained most of the choices and why they were made. |
Written
analysis explained all pertinent choices and why there were made. |
|
3.
How well did the project and presentation reflect the
nature/content of the book? (As part of this, consider the
“significance” of what was reflected—Did the student just stick to
portraying/using basic, literal connections OR did the student display a
deeper understanding of the work, how it was created, and why?) |
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
It did not
reflect the book. |
It attempted
to reflect the book. |
It did reflect
the book, but the connections were weak/ focused on insignificant matters. |
It reflected
the book, the connections were true to the book and reasonably significant.
|
It reflected
the book. The connections were true and totally significant to the book. |
|
4.
How thorough and clear was the presentation? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
It was hard to
follow the presentation either because the content was confusing or the
speaker did not articulate well. |
It was a
little difficult to follow the presentation. The presentation could have
been more thorough. |
The
presentation was clear but could have been a little more thorough |
The
presentation was clear and thorough |
The
presentation was completely clear and thoroughly covered all aspects of the
project. |
|
5.
Effort and Involvement: Did the project fit the number of people
involved in creating it (in terms of work load and presentation?) |