e. e. cummings from in class today
In class today, we started interacting with e. e. cummings's poem [brIght]. If you had further comments about it, feel free to post them here. Meanwhile, here is my free write on it from class today:
What is with the stupid capitals? They follow an order.... Sort of .... Starts with "I"... is that significant? Something to do with the self and .......ok... so we start with I, the self I think and then the one other weird word to start is "star" which eventually gets revealed as the capitals in "bright" shift and then letters disappear.....
Am "I" bright? Self-important?
Versus the star at first which are around me and I don't notice so much until later after I lose myself... my self-importance?
But then there's this other stuff..... "soft" "calm" "holy" ok... holy obviously I associate with a higher being, a god..... again, something outside myself, something that controls the stars........ controls me.....
"deep" and "big" could also go with the "holy," my idea of a god would be "big" (omnipresent, always there) and "deep" because really s/he would be the most significant being in existence....
The alone is troubling............... "yEs" and "alone"
Is "who" asking who is "god?"
Ok.... Read through again here................... The parentheses are bugging the heck out of me. Is god lonely?
"near" seems to be an oddball.... What is near? Stars aren't... is god? "eyes........ I thought I say an eyes in here...........................no, just that yEs makes me think of eyes...............why are there shifting capitals in the yes too? And the who? They don't spell anything do they? IRBGSEHYOHTW um, no................................................is someone who is "holy" the... no, I don't think so.
Ok.... I really think I have something with the loss of self-importance but I can't figure the rest. You'd think with the calm and deep and soft and near that you'd feel a sense of peace with this poem, but I don't... the end is disturbing. This is sort of like "a leaf falls" because there seem to be those two basic ideas happening again.... Being at one with the universe and being totally alone in it. But this time I think the loneliness is the dominating feeling because of that last line which is so overwhelmingly sad..... especially if it means that god is lonely..... that doesn't jive with the whole loss of self-importance thing though because if we/I had truly lost it, god would be more important to me......
I like the idea of a puzzle (thank you, Lucia)...... we're always trying to figure it out... religion, significance..... our own significance....hmmmm
Posted by s.spachman
at 7:00 PM CDT